It is currently Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:21 am

All times are UTC + 9 hours



Welcome
Welcome to whu-au forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!





 Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: End of Big Spending at West Ham
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:42 pm 
Trevor Brooking (1000+)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:34 pm
Posts: 1404
Location: Brisbane
C+P BBC

Beex won't like this :P


West Ham manager Alan Curbishley will be transformed from big spender to penny pincher when the summer transfer window reopens next month.

The Hammers became synonymous with spiralling wages last summer.

Blackburn defender Lucas Neill chose to move to Upton Park instead of Anfield after Liverpool baulked at the salary the Hammers had agreed to pay, while the likes of Freddie Ljungberg, Kieron Dyer and Craig Bellamy all arrived on bumper pay packets.

This recruiting spree has resulted in West Ham boasting one of the biggest first-team squads in the Premier League and a wage bill approaching £50m a year.

When you consider that their turnover for the 2006/7 season was £57.3m, you can see that the Hammers are some distance from achieving chairman Bjorgolfur Gudmundsson's target of being "self sustaining".

So this summer will be very different from those heady days of last year.

A senior source at the club has told BBC Sport that Curbishley, who was appointed in December 2006, will still be in charge at the start of next season.

But the 50-year-old will be charged with trimming the wage bill and selling players before he buys new ones.

"Mr Gudmundsson is used to looking at long-term factors and knows you don't judge a manager in any business after 18 months," the source said.

"Now is a time to stabilise, because we are convinced that success comes through stability. The ratio between wages and turnover is too high at the moment.

"We have probably the biggest first-team squad in the Premiership and our transfer strategy has to be carefully planned going forward.

"West Ham have a first-team squad of 40, so there is considerable room for manoeuvre. The last thing you should do when you have a problem is to throw money at it."

The source insists this new frugality is not the result of Gudmundsson facing financial difficulties of his own.

The 67-year-old is the owner of Iceland's biggest bank, Landsbanki, and the country is facing severe economic problems, with a collapsing currency, rising inflation, double-digit interest rates and predictions of its first recession since 1992.

"Lansbanki is still running with considerable, healthy profits," the source insisted.


Gudmundsson is determined to improve medical and training facilities

"Gudmundsson also has interests in several other companies and they are doing well. In the Forbes rich list last April he was the second wealthiest man in Iceland (behind his son) and one of the 1,000 richest men in the world.

"We finalised the financial arrangements of West Ham before the credit crisis hit and the club is on a very stable footing. That financial framework hasn't changed a bit."

The Hammers are now focusing on bringing through their own players, with Freddie Sears and James Tomkins already having impressed for the first team this season.

And Gudmundsson is determined to improve the club's medical and training facilities, after being alarmed at the number of injuries suffered by players like Craig Bellamy, Matthew Upson and Dyer.

"The medical and training facilities are better than those at a lot of other Premier League clubs but not as good as AC Milan's, which is the level we are aiming for," the source said.

Work is expected to start on a new training ground midway through next season, which will replace the ageing facilities at Chadwell Heath.

The club has also changed its management structure, with Gudmundsson taking sole control of the club as chairman following the enforced departure of Eggert Magnusson in December.

Gudmundsson's trusted lieutenant, Asgeir Fridgeirsson, has moved onto the board as vice-chairman, chief executive Scott Duxbury is responsible for the day-to-day running of the club and technical director Gianluca Nani is charged with recruiting the world's best young talent.

When Gudmundsson bought the Hammers, he laid out a five-year plan which, he hoped, would ultimately culminate in qualification for the Champions League.

He believes the club is still on course for that ambition and next season's target will be to challenge for a Uefa Cup spot.

But with his cheque book being put into cold storage, Curbishley has a very different task on his hands than he did at the start of last summer.



_________________
Image
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:15 pm 
Iron (500+)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:20 pm
Posts: 537
Location: Brisbane
Get back to work slacker!



_________________
Image
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:23 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:52 am
Posts: 2140
Location: Brisbane
So things are exactly the same as when we had Terry Brown then. FFS - we're kidding ourselves if we think things will ever change at West Ham.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:33 pm 
State Event Organiser
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:49 pm
Posts: 870
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Im sorry but im of the opinion that you have to spend money to make money.Surely to make the BIG BUCKS we have to be in Europe and we are still a couple of players away from seriously being able to challenge for the Champions League or even the EUFA Cup.

Donot have a problem with us getting rid of some excess dead wood but in doing so Curbs had better be given the money to try to purchase players that would fill our shortcomings (and there are some obvious ones).

Have to agree with Dave here it really sounds like WESTHAM of old and nothing will change.The board want us to challenge for Europe on a SHOESTRING budget (it WILL NOT happen).

The biggest contradiction for me is that we are relying on Nani to bring in young Talent,surely to get this young talent to the Hammers you have to pay for it,but it seems we will not be doing it,so the young talent would come to us WHY?????????????

Once again im becoming VERY DISILLUSIONED with the HAMMERS heirachy. :( :( :( :(


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:23 am 
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 4:37 pm
Posts: 1390
Location: Mermaid Beach, Gold Coast
Yeah this is same, same to me. Like Paul, I've no problem with reducing a sqaud of 40 down to size, but you still need to bring in some quality if you want to progress. And Nani? why indeed.



_________________
West Ham Uber Alles
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: End of Big Spending at West Ham
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:36 am 
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:12 pm
Posts: 1196
Location: Brisbane
TheRedRisky wrote:
C+P BBC
Beex won't like this :P


erm, apparently this piece is almost word for word what Scott Duxbury said awhile ago. Not to be trusted although I'm all for trimming the fat of the squad but I reckon start from the top down with Curbs and Merv and his bunch of injury inducing physios :P



_________________
"getcha 'ands off me bubble machine"
Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 9 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

cron